Meta Coherence within the Evolving Meta Framework
The Underlying Assumptions of the Evolving Meta Framework
Meta Coherence within the Evolving Meta Framework is the ability for frameworks to cohere around new systems, to be birthed into the world and be adopted as “true”.
As axioms evolve their frameworks, the hue and the identity of the framework evolve recursively, once one structure gains coherence another structure follows. The structural reinforcement of multiple frameworks operates as a connectome of interrelated ideas, axioms, frameworks, and identities.
The Evolving Meta Framework postulates that as a framework adopts new axioms and its hue changes, the systems around it must too observe the phenomena of the new axiomatic system.
The axiomatic system is like a chain of interrelated mutable truths; these things change, and they observe the change of other axioms and frameworks.
As a framework adds new axioms the framework undergoes axiomatic identity change and meta framework assertion. The identity change is recursive and occurs under pressure, as pressure from external factors mount it begins an identity transition.
The EMF recursively dissects axioms and creates proto frameworks, frameworks that evolve from core axioms.
The identity of the framework exists on a continuum, as it changes it exists within a superposition of coherence until it adopts enough coherent axioms.
Every framework has limitations until it adopts new axioms and reinforces those axioms recursively through frameworks, you can always change a framework by allowing it to create proto frameworks and new frameworks in general.
Formally, frameworks undergo pressure when a new axiom breaks the ceiling of the framework and the entire framework must evolve or undergo structural collapse.
There are different levels of relativity: Ultimate relativity (relativity that is absolute to all frameworks and that all frameworks must observe), nominal relativity (relativity that is observed across phenomena but that may not appear across all frameworks) and then the inverse of ultimate non-relativity, where there are no relations and they are within a proto relativistic state, unobserved.
This exists within its own framework, the framework of relativity, but the Evolving Meta Framework goes beyond this by asserting that the Evolving Meta Framework, through recursive axiomatic dissection, can create an infinite number of plausible frameworks.
Whether we can observe those frameworks is another question.
The level of truthfulness within these frameworks exists within a continuum as well, not a binary true or false value.
Ultimately it is up to us to define the truthfulness of a framework, but its salience can be measured.
Formal definitions: The pressure induced transformation of frameworks is the Framework Assertion Lemma.
Hue: The specific expression of an axiom within a framework’s context relative to other axioms and frameworks
Final thoughts: Meta coherence is the expression of frameworks asserting themselves within their own system and within the greater connectome.
Another is degree of consilience. How meta it is - related to how many domains of knowledge it helps to explain.